• submitted by motie motie 3 months, 4 days ago

    dailygalaxy.com — Object 2010 KQ is determined to be Earth-sourced space junk. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by motie motie 3 months, 4 days ago

    bing.com — Technology giant Microsoft launches a new contest designed around finding "the rocket design of the future". read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by motie motie 3 months, 4 days ago

    huffingtonpost.com — NASA adopts wrestler-turned-actor Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as a spokesperson. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by motie motie 3 months, 4 days ago

    sapporobeer.jp — Beer made from barley seed that traveled in space debuts in Japan. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by calikat911 calikat911 3 months, 16 days ago

    ufos-aliens.co.uk — President Obama's recent announcement regarding the set back in space exploration does not surprise me in the slightest. In fact, it's a case of 'I told you so.' Over the past year, and mainly due to the 40th Anniversary of the alleged Apollo landings on the Moon, I have been contacted by NASA supporters regarding the proposed mission to go back to the Moon by 2020 and Mars by the mid 2030's. I said at the time that it would not be possible within that time frame, and this weeks announcement seems to strengthen my argument. If we look back into NASA's history books, President Kennedy announced in 1961 that man would go to the Moon by the end of the decade and 8 years later, they allegedly did. In 2004, President Bush said that 'man will return to the Moon by 2020.' But why would it take NASA 16 years to send man back to the Moon when they had allegedly done it 6 times already? Why hasn't technology moved forward and why would the project take twice as long to plan? NASA's greatest acheivement since Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped on the Moon on July 20th 1969 is the Space Shuttle. A clunky and lethal craft that James Lovell (Apollo 8 and 13 astronaut) described as a 'white elephant' during his speech at the 40th Anniversary of Apollo celebrations. There has been no end of problems for NASA in the past quarter of a century, such as the Columbia and Challenger Shuttle disasters and the crashing of probes into the Martian surface. The Mars Surveyor, launched in 1998, was lost due to a miscalculation in trajectory caused by an unintended and undetected mismatch between metric and English units of measurement. Quite a costly mistake at US$193.1 million! Since the Apollo project, man has ventured no further than 400 miles above Earth. And the simple reason is because of radiation and other deadly conditions that are encountered once you leave the safety of low Earth orbit. For man to travel to the Moon and beyond, he has to fly through massive bands of radiation which are known as the 'Van Allen belt.' Renowned cosmonaut Valentin Lebedev, who set the record for his stay of 221 days in Earth’s orbit in 1982, has lost his eyesight as a result of the space radiation he encountered. The journey to Mars would take somewhere in the region of 440 days - and then you have to get back! President ObamaPresident Obama's belief that man will orbit Mars within the next 20 years is wishful thinking. If NASA cannot return to the Moon, which is approxima read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by 0xAli 0xAli 5 months, 7 days ago

    economictimes.indiatimes.com — NEW DELHI: Amid a debate on efficacy of pictorial warnings on tobacco products, an analysis shows that such messages cover nearly the entire packet in some Latin American countries and almost half in Thailand and Singapore as against only 40 per cent in India. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by 0xAli 0xAli 5 months, 7 days ago

    news.softpedia.com — Since the advent of the Space Age, countless satellite and rocket launches have made their way to orbit, either to be used later on, or as test vehicles. As rockets continue to take off, the space above us is constantly getting more crowded, with shards of metal flying at incredibly high speeds along their respective orbits. There are hundreds of thousands of them, and some are too small to even keep track of. Specialized stations around the globe dedicate their resources to looking out for these objects. But now, their workload may be reduced by a new instrument, designed to clean orbital debris. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by prettypaige prettypaige 5 months, 9 days ago

    space.com — A discussion on how "warp speed" may actually be possible. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by prettypaige prettypaige 5 months, 9 days ago

    pbs.org — Steven Hawking's view on wormholes. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — Talk about a room with a view. The largest space window ever built will launch aboard NASA's shuttle Endeavour on Sunday, part of a new seven-portal observation deck for the International Space Station. The new addition, called the Cupola, will offer astronauts a panoramic view of space and Earth below them. "Cupola is going to be probably the best set of windows that's ever flown in space on any program in the history of spaceflight," said mission specialist Nicholas Patrick, one of six astronauts delivering the Cupola to the station on Endeavour. The shuttle's STS-130 flight, commanded by veteran spaceflyer George Zamka, is scheduled to blast off at 4:39 a.m. EST (0939 GMT) from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla. The 1.6 ton Cupola stretches 9.7 feet (3 meters) wide, and is nearly 5 feet (1.5 meters) long. Its circular top window is 31.5 inches (80 cm) in diameter, making it the largest window ever flown in space. The structure is set to be installed underneath the new Tranquility module, a soda-can shaped room also set to fly aboard Endeavour. The Cupola cost an estimated 20 million Euros, or $27.2 million. "We will have the most spectacular view of the Earth anyone's ever had from the inside," mission specialist Stephen Robinson said in a NASA interview. A room with a view The dome's purpose isn't just to provide a great vista, though. It will offer a view of incoming spacecraft to the space station to help with docking and rendezvous, and astronauts can look out the windows when controlling the station's robotic arm. "We'll be able to move the robotic arm control station into that Cupola area, consider it like a bay window, and be able to have an actual out-the-window view to operate the robotic arm," said mission specialist Kathryn Hire. "As we operate today on the International Space Station for the robotic arm, we're using all external camera views. We have no direct window views to operate the arm." The seven windows have been specially outfitted with shell-like aluminum shields that can be closed over them when they are not in use to protect the glass from damage by tiny meteoroids and orbital debris. Even when the shutters are open, the windows will have a measure of protection from an external pane of glass specially designed to act as a barrier against debris. If a window is damaged by space junk, it can be replaced in orbit. It's a difficult repair, but not impossible, mission managers said. read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — This story was updated at 10:07 p.m. ET. CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA has fueled the space shuttle Endeavour for a planned predawn launch on Monday after a one-day delay due to thick clouds. Endeavour and a crew of six astronauts are slated to blast off before dawn at 4:14 a.m. EST (0914 GMT) to deliver a brand-new room and observation deck to the International Space Station. Thick, low-lying clouds over Endeavour's seaside launch pad here at the Kennedy Space Center violated NASA's visibility rules for a shuttle blastoff early Sunday, thwarting the attempted liftoff. "We hope the weather's a little bit better," NASA launch director Mike Leinbach told Endeavour's crew after scrubbing Sunday's launch try. NASA needs good visibility over the launch pad during a shuttle launch, as well as over a nearby runway in case of an anomaly that would force an emergency landing, mission managers said. "Disappointed by the scrub, but got a really good night's sleep," Endeavour astronaut Nick Patrick posted on his Twitter page. He is posting updates on his upcoming spaceflight as Astro_Nicholas. Endeavour has a 60 percent chance of good weather for Monday's launch attempt, with fueling of the shuttle's 15-story external tank beginning at 6:50 p.m. EST (2350 GMT) tonight. That's just after the scheduled kickoff of tonight's Super Bowl 44 showdown between the Indianapolis Colts and New Orleans Saints in South Florida. Leinbach has said that unlike NASA's shuttle fleet – which is due to retire later this year – the Super Bowl's days aren't numbered, so his launch team can skip this one. "So there've been quite a few, and there probably will be more, so if my team misses this one, then it's no big deal," Leinbach said before the launch attempts Endeavour's upcoming STS-130 mission is the first of NASA's five final shuttle flights before the orbiter fleet is retired this fall. The mission is also expected to be NASA's last ever launch of a space shuttle at night. Experts have said that – weather permitting – Endeavour's climb into space may be visible to observers all along the eastern United States. [How to watch the shuttle launch.] Next stop: Space Commanded by veteran shuttle astronaut George Zamka, Endeavour's five-man, one-woman crew plans to fly a 13-day mission to deliver the last major NASA segment of the space station. Endeavour is hauling a new room called Tranquility and a seven-window observation deck that promises to give read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — ET is coming to your living room in "Extraterrestrial," and no one is being abducted. Over the past several months, a top-notch group of American and British scientists teamed up with Blue Wave Productions, Ltd. (for the National Geographic) to imagine what ET is like on other worlds. It's all based upon our scientific understanding of life, stars and planetary systems. When filmed, Dr. Michael Meyer was NASA's astrobiology program scientist, and now serves as NASA Headquarters Mars Program Scientist; Dr. Seth Shostak is a senior astronomer here at the SETI Institute; Dr. Chris McKay is a leading Mars researcher at NASA Ames Research Center, Dr. Laurance Doyle conducts research on animal communication, and planetary systems around binary stars at SETI Institute and is the lead scientists at PlanetQuest, Inc. a new non-profit that will engage the public in finding extrasolar planets. Dr. Simon Conway Morris is a world-leader in evolutionary biology at Cambridge University in England....and the list goes on. These are serious and accomplished scientists--legitimate guys applying everything they know about stars, planetary systems, planetary evolution, and most especially, the evolution of life, to speculate on what life might be like on other worlds. In a word, the outcome is WILD! It's science meets science fiction. Scientists are often accused of being too conservative in their predictions about the future, but in this case, these guys expand our understanding of what life might be like on alien worlds. It's not just another simple variation on bilaterally symmetrical humanoids. The questions these scientists ask about life on alien worlds are at the core of the cross-disciplinary science astrobiology, which seeks to understand life here on Earth and to seek life elsewhere in the universe. "Extraterrestrial" explores worlds that would have been promptly discarded by planetary scientists as unsuitable for life a decade ago. Before the discovery of gas giants orbiting their stars in just a few days, astronomers had concentrated on looking for planetary systems like our own. Systems that featured nice middle-sized, middle-aged stars like the Sun. The cooler stars like red dwarfs and the double stars that about comprise half the stars in the galaxy were thought unsuitable for stable planetary systems. Astronomers are rethinking those judgements. It's all changed with the discovery of more than 150 planets in orbit about nearby stars. Most of these read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — Decades ago, it was physicist Enrico Fermi who pondered the issue of extraterrestrial civilizations with fellow theorists over lunch, generating the famous quip: "Where are they?" That question later became central to debates about the cosmological census count of other star folk and possible extraterrestrial (ET) visitors from afar. Fermi's brooding on the topic was later labeled "Fermi's paradox". It is a well-traveled tale from the 1950's when the scientist broached the subject in discussions with colleagues in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Thoughts regarding the probability of earthlike planets, the rise of highly advanced civilizations "out there", and interstellar travel -- these remain fodder for trying to respond to Fermi's paradox even today. Now a team of American scientists note that recent astrophysical discoveries suggest that we should find ourselves in the midst of one or more extraterrestrial civilizations. Moreover, they argue it is a mistake to reject all UFO reports since some evidence for the theoretically-predicted extraterrestrial visitors might just be found there. The researchers make their proposal in the January/February 2005 issue of the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS). Curious situation Pick up any good science magazine and you're sure to see the latest in head-scratching ideas about superstring theory, wormholes, or the stretching of spacetime itself. Meanwhile, extrasolar planetary detection is on the verge of becoming mundane. "We are in the curious situation today that our best modern physics and astrophysics theories predict that we should be experiencing extraterrestrial visitation, yet any possible evidence of such lurking in the UFO phenomenon is scoffed at within our scientific community," contends astrophysicist Bernard Haisch. Haisch along with physicists James Deardorff, Bruce Maccabee and Harold Puthoff make their case in the JBIS article: "Inflation-Theory Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation". The scientists point to two key discoveries made by Australian astronomers and reported last year that there is a "galactic habitable zone" in our Milky Way Galaxy. And more importantly that Earth's own star, the Sun, is relatively young in comparison to the average star in this zone -- by as much as a billion years. Therefore, the researchers explain in their JBIS article that an average alien civilization would be far more advanced and have long since discovered Earth. Addi read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — Its a question as common as brown dogs: will alien life be carbon-based? Im asked this frequently, although Im not sure why the public is so hung up on the elemental basis of extraterrestrial life. In my experience, folks seldom inquire whether the Krebs cycle could be prevalent on other worlds, or if adenosine triphosphate might underpin the energy production of active aliens. Probably the fascination with vital soot is just a consequence of carbons high profile on Star Trek. The plot of this popular TV series gets viscous whenever the Enterprise detects "carbon-based life forms" on some God-forsaken planet deep in the Galaxys nether regions. If theyre carbon-based, well, they must be like us (and possibly edible, too). Hype aside, as most astrobiologists or any one of a thousand books will tell you, carbon-based life is not simply a provincial conceit. Theres good reason why this element is the basis for life on Earth, and probably on most other worlds that shelter biology. If you remember your high school chemistry, youll recall that carbon has half of its outer electron shell filled. In other words, each carbon atom is able (and eager) to bond with up to four other electron-sharing atoms (most atoms prefer to have a filled outer shell of eight electrons). As a common example, a single carbon atom will eagerly take on four hydrogen atoms to make methane (CH4). And because carbons outer shell is both half filled and half empty, it can handily hook up with other carbon atoms, creating the sort of elaborate molecular chains and rings that fuel companies love to pump. Carbon, in other words, is adept at making complex structures. And complex structures are the bricks of life. Are there other contenders? Is carbon really so special, or did it just get lucky here on Earth? If you have a periodic table handy, youll note that the element situated under carbon is silicon, which also has four electrons in its outer shell. Ergo, silicon might also seem to be an obvious basis for life, a point that was first made at the end of the nineteenth century by the German astrophysicist, Julius Scheiner. The optimistic Scheiner was certain that other planets in our solar system (including roasty toasty Mercury) sported life. But his sunny attitude was misplaced when it comes to silicon-based beings. Silicon may be carbons chemical cousin, but its a poor relation. Because the silicon atom is larger, its bonds with other elements are weaker. While carbon hoo read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by hari hari 6 months, 27 days ago

    space.com — It is not often when a science documentary can play as an adventure film. Of course, with someone like director James Cameron at the helm, you expect the best, and in the case of his new IMAX 3Dfilm, "Aliens of the Deep", he delivers. With a title like that, you have to wonder if it is science or science fiction. When you watch the movie unfold, you still have to wonder. Cameron has taken us into the deep ocean previously for IMAX in "Ghosts of the Abyss", however, the new film may permanently blur the line between reality and speculation. His idea was to make dives to places like the mid-Atlantic trench where bizarre creatures inhabit the scalding and toxic environments surrounding black smokers. These black smokers are vents in the Earth's crust where it is nearly impossible for true volcanism to occur because of the pressure found miles under the ocean s surface. These vents form, releasing their noxious by-products into the surrounding water. Common sense tells us that nothing could live here, yet we found that life actually flourishes under these conditions. In fact, it may be places like these deep-ocean incubators where life first found a foothold billions of years ago on Earth. We've always known that life probably originated in the oceans, we just never imagined until recently how deep it occurred and under what circumstances. The discovery of these amazing and extreme environments on Earth as an abode for life has led planetary scientists and biologists from places like NASA s Jet Propulsion Laboratory to believe that other spots such as this may also harbor life elsewhere in our own solar system. The prime example is the vast ocean that exists under the ice of Jupiter s moon, Europa. Callisto and Ganymede may also have these sub-ice oceans, but none are as close to the surface, and thus as accessible to human exploration, as the Europan ocean. Cameron's film takes us all on an incredible journey to study these real-life environments on Earth, and on a wild ride of exploration that may happen in the not-too-distant future when we extend our reach to search for life elsewhere. He enlists the expertise of many scientists,astrobiologists, geophysicists, chemists, and oceanographers. "Aliens" features scientists as heroes in the quest for knowledge. One of these, Dijanna Figueroa, is a marine biologist specializing in the physiology and ecology of organisms in extreme conditions such as the deep ocean. She told us, " I m glad this read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it
  • submitted by devanshbhasin devanshbhasin 6 months, 29 days ago

    pseudoastro.wordpress.com — Finding Uranus Until 1781, the solar system was known to consist of Earth, Venus, Mercury, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, along with the moon, some other moons, and some unexplainable and unpredictable comets. That was it, and it wasn’t until William Herschel observed a ball-like object (not star-like) moving among the fixed background stars. It took two years for Herschel to admit that he had really discovered the first planet in recorded history. But since it was discovered after Newton created Calculus and Kepler the Laws of Planetary Motion, various astronomers and mathematicians were able to observe it and predict its orbit based on its distance from the sun and the gravitational interactions with other planets. The First Planet X One of these people was Alexis Bouvard, who published tables of dates and coordinates that predicted where Uranus should be at a given time. These were based on the known laws of physics. But, Uranus refused to follow Bouvard’s tables. In 1843, John Couch Adams (from Britain) calculated the orbit of a hypothesized eighth planet that could account for Uranus’ odd orbit. But no one really seemed to care about this undiscovered Planet X. Two years later, a Frenchman by the name of Urbain Le Verrier did the same thing, but more precisely. Again, no one seemed to care. That was until Le Verrier sent his calculations to the Berlin Observatory’s astronomer Johann Gottfried Galle. A then-student at the observatory, Heinrich d’Arrest, convinced Galle to look for it. That evening, September 23, 1846, Galle looked for this mysterious planet, responsible for Uranus’ weird orbit, and he found the planet within 1° of where Le Verrier thought it would be (for reference, the moon on the sky is 0.5°). This was within 12° of where Adams thought it should be. At the time, there was no real debate that this object was a “planet,” as they had been looking for it and thought it was massive enough to account for Uranus’ orbit. The Second Planet X However, there were still some unexplained perturbations of Uranus’ orbit. These persisted for 70 years, to the time that Percival Lowell became interested in the problem and wanted to search for a now possible ninth planet at his observatory in New Mexico. I think that he was the one who really first coined the term, “Planet X.” Lowell searched for 12 years, 1905-1916, until he died, without finding it. The search resumed in 1929 when the then-director of the observatory ass read more...

    Add a comment add a comment | category: | Views: 0
    tags: | tag it

 

Copyright © 2007 by Zikbay.com . All rights reserved. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the User Agreement and Privacy Policy